🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold action to prohibit social networking access for individuals under sixteen is sparking debate around the globe. Lawmakers, child protection groups, and guardians are monitoring closely to see if this strategy will set a precedent for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

In Europe, a rising group of nations are moving toward comparable restrictions.

• The Danish government plans a restriction on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister arguing that mobile devices and apps are "taking away our kids' innocence". A law could be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the AI".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have suggested that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a bill increasing the access age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a legislative committee has suggested a similar action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The government in The Dutch government has urged guardians to restrict their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has adopted a non-binding motion demanding a ban for minors except if guardian approval is given. Even though it warns of the "compulsive" design of these platforms, the resolution does not establish binding law.

"An effective age limit is a solid starting point," stated one European lawmaker supporting the measure.

The United Kingdom: An Evidence-Based Eye

For the United Kingdom, the administration has not ruled out a possible ban, arguing that "no measure is being dismissed" but maintaining any action must be "grounded in strong evidence".

Previously, support grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was in the end weakened. Instead, the administration vowed to conduct more studies the matter.

Charities have expressed concerns. An organization established by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a strict age ban might not make platforms safer and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of harm when teens reach the legal age.

"Australia's ban is a answer to the inability of the social media companies to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for young users," commented a prominent online safety campaigner.

America: A Fragmented Picture

Stateside, regulation is primarily occurring at the regional government level due to national inaction.

• Utah demands adult approval for those under 18 to use social media and controls late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring under-14s from accessing social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to 60 minutes of social media time per day, with extra access needing adult consent.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also introduced laws demanding parental consent for teenagers to open social media profiles.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some politicians to follow Australia's example, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Outlook

Outside of Europe and the US, further nations are likewise considering moves.

• The Malaysian government plans to restrict social media for under-16s effective next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for one major platform to 16.

However, global bodies strike a more nuanced tone. A major UN agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The agency highlights that online platforms can be a "critical link" for vulnerable children and that bans should not be a "excuse" for tech companies to invest in safety.

Even as this worldwide debate unfolds, the steps of the Australian government and others show that policymakers globally are increasingly prepared to wait for tech companies to self-regulate.